-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
fix: update pyproject.toml and requirements.txt with required fields #49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ | ||
| [project] | ||
| name = "bolt-python-ai-agent-template" | ||
| version = "0.1.0" | ||
| requires-python = ">=3.9" | ||
| dependencies = [ | ||
| "slack-sdk==3.40.0", | ||
| "slack-bolt==1.27.0", | ||
| "slack-cli-hooks<1.0.0", | ||
| "openai==2.12.0", | ||
| "python-dotenv==1.2.1", | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| [project.optional-dependencies] | ||
| dev = [ | ||
| "pytest==8.4.2", | ||
| "ruff==0.14.7", | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| [tool.setuptools.packages.find] | ||
| include = ["agent*", "listeners*"] | ||
|
Comment on lines
+19
to
+20
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 👁️🗨️ praise: This might be difficult to maintain onward but perhaps we revisit sample structure later?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yea, I wonder if we should start to store everything in |
||
|
|
||
| [tool.ruff] | ||
| [tool.ruff.lint] | ||
| [tool.ruff.format] | ||
|
|
||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🪓 question: Should we prefer
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yea, I think so. In future iterations, let's start only including |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔭 question: I'm alright keeping this as a required dependency, but would we want to move this to optional? I'm also still a believer in pinned version FWIW-
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, let's move it to optional in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional and pinned >> 👀