fix: Remove evaluation metric key from schema which failed on some LLMs

packages/sdk/server-ai/src/ldai/judge/__init__.py

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ def __init__(
         self._ai_config = ai_config
         self._ai_config_tracker = ai_config_tracker
         self._ai_provider = ai_provider
-        self._evaluation_response_structure = EvaluationSchemaBuilder.build(ai_config.evaluation_metric_key)
+        self._evaluation_response_structure = EvaluationSchemaBuilder.build()
 
     async def evaluate(
         self,
@@ -77,10 +77,9 @@ async def evaluate(
             )
 
             success = response.metrics.success
-
             evals = self._parse_evaluation_response(response.data)
 
-            if self._ai_config.evaluation_metric_key not in evals:
+            if not evals:
                 log.warn('Judge evaluation did not return the expected evaluation')
                 success = False
 
@@ -175,47 +174,27 @@ def _interpolate_message(self, content: str, variables: Dict[str, str]) -> str:
 
     def _parse_evaluation_response(self, data: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, EvalScore]:
         """
-        Parses the structured evaluation response from the AI provider.
-
-        :param data: The structured response data
-        :return: Dictionary of evaluation scores keyed by metric key
+        Parses the structured evaluation response. Expects {"evaluation": {"score": n, "reasoning": "..."}}.
         """
         results: Dict[str, EvalScore] = {}
-
-        if not data.get('evaluations') or not isinstance(data['evaluations'], dict):
-            log.warn('Invalid response: missing or invalid evaluations object')
-            return results
-
-        evaluations = data['evaluations']
-
         metric_key = self._ai_config.evaluation_metric_key
         if not metric_key:
             log.warn('Evaluation metric key is missing')
             return results
 
-        evaluation = evaluations.get(metric_key)
-
-        if not evaluation or not isinstance(evaluation, dict):
-            log.warn(f'Missing evaluation for metric key: {metric_key}')
+        evaluation = data.get('evaluation') if isinstance(data, dict) else None
+        if not isinstance(evaluation, dict):
+            log.warn('Invalid response: missing or invalid evaluation')
             return results
 
         score = evaluation.get('score')
         reasoning = evaluation.get('reasoning')
-
         if not isinstance(score, (int, float)) or score < 0 or score > 1:
-            log.warn(
-                f'Invalid score evaluated for {metric_key}: {score}. '
-                'Score must be a number between 0 and 1 inclusive'
-            )
+            log.warn(f'Invalid score: {score}. Score must be a number between 0 and 1 inclusive')
             return results
-
         if not isinstance(reasoning, str):
-            log.warn(
-                f'Invalid reasoning evaluated for {metric_key}: {reasoning}. '
-                'Reasoning must be a string'
-            )
+            log.warn('Invalid reasoning: must be a string')
             return results
 
         results[metric_key] = EvalScore(score=float(score), reasoning=reasoning)
-
         return results

packages/sdk/server-ai/src/ldai/judge/evaluation_schema_builder.py

@@ -1,79 +1,53 @@
-"""Internal class for building dynamic evaluation response schemas."""
+"""Internal class for building evaluation response schemas."""
 
-from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
+from typing import Any, Dict
 
 
 class EvaluationSchemaBuilder:
     """
-    Internal class for building dynamic evaluation response schemas.
+    Internal class for building evaluation response schemas.
     Not exported - only used internally by Judge.
+    Schema is a fixed shape: one "evaluation" object with score and reasoning.
+    The judge config's evaluation_metric_key is only used when keying the result,
+    not in the schema.
     """
 
     @staticmethod
-    def build(evaluation_metric_key: Optional[str]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
+    def build() -> Dict[str, Any]:
         """
-        Build an evaluation response schema from evaluation metric key.
+        Build the evaluation response schema. No parameters; the schema is
+        always the same. The judge keys the parsed result by its config's
+        evaluation_metric_key.
 
-        :param evaluation_metric_key: Evaluation metric key, or None if not available
-        :return: Schema dictionary for structured output, or None if evaluation_metric_key is None
-        """
-        if not evaluation_metric_key:
-            return None
+        In practice the model returns JSON like:
+          {"evaluation": {"score": 0.85, "reasoning": "The response is accurate."}}
 
+        :return: Schema dictionary for structured output
+        """
         return {
             'title': 'EvaluationResponse',
-            'description': f"Response containing evaluation results for {evaluation_metric_key} metric",
+            'description': 'Response containing an evaluation (score and reasoning).',
             'type': 'object',
             'properties': {
-                'evaluations': {
+                'evaluation': {
                     'type': 'object',
-                    'description': (
-                        f"Object containing evaluation results for "
-                        f"{evaluation_metric_key} metric"
-                    ),
-                    'properties': EvaluationSchemaBuilder._build_key_properties(evaluation_metric_key),
-                    'required': [evaluation_metric_key],
+                    'description': 'The evaluation result.',
+                    'properties': {
+                        'score': {
+                            'type': 'number',
+                            'minimum': 0,
+                            'maximum': 1,
+                            'description': 'Score between 0.0 and 1.0.',
+                        },
+                        'reasoning': {
+                            'type': 'string',
+                            'description': 'Reasoning behind the score.',
+                        },
+                    },
+                    'required': ['score', 'reasoning'],
                     'additionalProperties': False,
                 },
             },
-            'required': ['evaluations'],
-            'additionalProperties': False,
-        }
-
-    @staticmethod
-    def _build_key_properties(evaluation_metric_key: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
-        """
-        Build properties for a single evaluation metric key.
-
-        :param evaluation_metric_key: Evaluation metric key
-        :return: Dictionary of properties for the key
-        """
-        return {
-            evaluation_metric_key: EvaluationSchemaBuilder._build_key_schema(evaluation_metric_key)
-        }
-
-    @staticmethod
-    def _build_key_schema(key: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
-        """
-        Build schema for a single evaluation metric key.
-
-        :param key: Evaluation metric key
-        :return: Schema dictionary for the key
-        """
-        return {
-            'type': 'object',
-            'properties': {
-                'score': {
-                    'type': 'number',
-                    'minimum': 0,
-                    'maximum': 1,
-                    'description': f'Score between 0.0 and 1.0 for {key}',
-                },
-                'reasoning': {
-                    'type': 'string',
-                    'description': f'Reasoning behind the score for {key}',
-                },
-            },
-            'required': ['score', 'reasoning'],
+            'required': ['evaluation'],
             'additionalProperties': False,
         }

packages/sdk/server-ai/tests/test_judge.py

@@ -109,16 +109,10 @@ def test_judge_initializes_with_evaluation_metric_key(
         assert judge._ai_config == judge_config_with_key
         assert judge._evaluation_response_structure is not None
         assert judge._evaluation_response_structure['title'] == 'EvaluationResponse'
-        assert '$ld:ai:judge:relevance' in judge._evaluation_response_structure['properties']['evaluations']['required']
-
-    def test_judge_initializes_without_evaluation_metric_key(
-        self, judge_config_without_key: AIJudgeConfig, tracker: LDAIConfigTracker, mock_ai_provider
-    ):
-        """Judge should initialize but have None for evaluation_response_structure."""
-        judge = Judge(judge_config_without_key, tracker, mock_ai_provider)
-
-        assert judge._ai_config == judge_config_without_key
-        assert judge._evaluation_response_structure is None
+        assert judge._evaluation_response_structure['required'] == ['evaluation']
+        eval_schema = judge._evaluation_response_structure['properties']['evaluation']
+        assert eval_schema['required'] == ['score', 'reasoning']
+        assert 'score' in eval_schema['properties'] and 'reasoning' in eval_schema['properties']
 
 
 class TestJudgeEvaluate:
@@ -155,14 +149,12 @@ async def test_evaluate_success_with_valid_response(
         """Evaluate should return JudgeResponse with valid evaluation."""
         mock_response = StructuredResponse(
             data={
-                'evaluations': {
-                    '$ld:ai:judge:relevance': {
-                        'score': 0.85,
-                        'reasoning': 'The response is highly relevant to the input.'
-                    }
+                'evaluation': {
+                    'score': 0.85,
+                    'reasoning': 'The response is highly relevant to the input.'
                 }
             },
-            raw_response='{"evaluations": {...}}',
+            raw_response='{"evaluation": {"score": 0.85, "reasoning": "..."}}',
             metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True)
         )
 
@@ -181,20 +173,40 @@ async def test_evaluate_success_with_valid_response(
         assert 'relevant' in result.evals['$ld:ai:judge:relevance'].reasoning.lower()
 
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
-    async def test_evaluate_handles_missing_evaluation_in_response(
+    async def test_evaluate_success_with_evaluation_response_shape(
         self, judge_config_with_key: AIJudgeConfig, tracker: LDAIConfigTracker, mock_ai_provider
     ):
-        """Evaluate should handle missing evaluation in response."""
+        """Evaluate should accept shape { evaluation: { score, reasoning } } and key by metric."""
         mock_response = StructuredResponse(
             data={
-                'evaluations': {
-                    'wrong-key': {
-                        'score': 0.5,
-                        'reasoning': 'Some reasoning'
-                    }
+                'evaluation': {
+                    'score': 0.9,
+                    'reasoning': 'The response is accurate and complete.',
                 }
             },
-            raw_response='{"evaluations": {...}}',
+            raw_response='{"evaluation": {"score": 0.9, "reasoning": "..."}}',
+            metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True),
+        )
+        mock_ai_provider.invoke_structured_model.return_value = mock_response
+        tracker.track_metrics_of = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response)
+
+        judge = Judge(judge_config_with_key, tracker, mock_ai_provider)
+        result = await judge.evaluate("What is feature flagging?", "Feature flagging is...")
+
+        assert result is not None
+        assert result.success is True
+        assert '$ld:ai:judge:relevance' in result.evals
+        assert result.evals['$ld:ai:judge:relevance'].score == 0.9
+        assert 'accurate' in result.evals['$ld:ai:judge:relevance'].reasoning.lower()
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_evaluate_handles_missing_evaluation_in_response(
+        self, judge_config_with_key: AIJudgeConfig, tracker: LDAIConfigTracker, mock_ai_provider
+    ):
+        """Evaluate should handle missing evaluation in response."""
+        mock_response = StructuredResponse(
+            data={},
+            raw_response='{}',
             metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True)
         )
 
@@ -216,14 +228,12 @@ async def test_evaluate_handles_invalid_score(
         """Evaluate should handle invalid score values."""
         mock_response = StructuredResponse(
             data={
-                'evaluations': {
-                    '$ld:ai:judge:relevance': {
-                        'score': 1.5,
-                        'reasoning': 'Some reasoning'
-                    }
+                'evaluation': {
+                    'score': 1.5,
+                    'reasoning': 'Some reasoning'
                 }
             },
-            raw_response='{"evaluations": {...}}',
+            raw_response='{"evaluation": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "..."}}',
             metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True)
         )
 
@@ -245,13 +255,11 @@ async def test_evaluate_handles_missing_reasoning(
         """Evaluate should handle missing reasoning."""
         mock_response = StructuredResponse(
             data={
-                'evaluations': {
-                    '$ld:ai:judge:relevance': {
-                        'score': 0.8,
-                    }
+                'evaluation': {
+                    'score': 0.8,
                 }
             },
-            raw_response='{"evaluations": {...}}',
+            raw_response='{"evaluation": {"score": 0.8}}',
             metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True)
         )
 
@@ -309,14 +317,12 @@ async def test_evaluate_messages_calls_evaluate(
 
         mock_response = StructuredResponse(
             data={
-                'evaluations': {
-                    '$ld:ai:judge:relevance': {
-                        'score': 0.9,
-                        'reasoning': 'Very relevant'
-                    }
+                'evaluation': {
+                    'score': 0.9,
+                    'reasoning': 'Very relevant'
                 }
             },
-            raw_response='{"evaluations": {...}}',
+            raw_response='{"evaluation": {"score": 0.9, "reasoning": "..."}}',
             metrics=LDAIMetrics(success=True)
         )
 
@@ -345,30 +351,21 @@ class TestEvaluationSchemaBuilder:
     """Tests for EvaluationSchemaBuilder."""
 
     def test_build_creates_correct_schema(self):
-        """Schema builder should create correct schema structure."""
-        schema = EvaluationSchemaBuilder.build('$ld:ai:judge:relevance')
-        
+        """Schema builder should create fixed schema (evaluation with score + reasoning, no key param)."""
+        schema = EvaluationSchemaBuilder.build()
+
         assert schema['title'] == 'EvaluationResponse'
         assert schema['type'] == 'object'
-        assert 'evaluations' in schema['properties']
-        assert '$ld:ai:judge:relevance' in schema['properties']['evaluations']['required']
-        assert '$ld:ai:judge:relevance' in schema['properties']['evaluations']['properties']
-
-        metric_schema = schema['properties']['evaluations']['properties']['$ld:ai:judge:relevance']
-        assert metric_schema['type'] == 'object'
-        assert 'score' in metric_schema['properties']
-        assert 'reasoning' in metric_schema['properties']
-        assert metric_schema['properties']['score']['type'] == 'number'
-        assert metric_schema['properties']['score']['minimum'] == 0
-        assert metric_schema['properties']['score']['maximum'] == 1
-
-    def test_build_key_properties_creates_single_key(self):
-        """_build_key_properties should create properties for a single key."""
-        properties = EvaluationSchemaBuilder._build_key_properties('$ld:ai:judge:relevance')
-
-        assert '$ld:ai:judge:relevance' in properties
-        assert len(properties) == 1
-        assert properties['$ld:ai:judge:relevance']['type'] == 'object'
+        assert schema['required'] == ['evaluation']
+        assert 'evaluation' in schema['properties']
+        eval_schema = schema['properties']['evaluation']
+        assert eval_schema['type'] == 'object'
+        assert eval_schema['required'] == ['score', 'reasoning']
+        assert 'score' in eval_schema['properties']
+        assert 'reasoning' in eval_schema['properties']
+        assert eval_schema['properties']['score']['type'] == 'number'
+        assert eval_schema['properties']['score']['minimum'] == 0
+        assert eval_schema['properties']['score']['maximum'] == 1
 
 
 class TestJudgeConfigSerialization: