Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 86
💛 - Coveralls |
2 similar comments
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 86
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 86
💛 - Coveralls |
|
Need to add compilation support. The Makefile is in bone101. |
src/pru.js
Outdated
| } | ||
| pruEnable(pruno, false); //disable PRU before loading firmware if not already disabled | ||
| var path = fw_path + pruno + ' -fw'; | ||
| shell.cp(filepath, path); //used because fs.copyFile() not supported, fast enough |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be a symlink? Does this work as a non-root user?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no it doesn't work as non-root user , will try to fix it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There may be a udev rule requirement or some other discussion with @RobertCNelson. Please share your ideas here and potentially on bbb.io/discuss to get other folks thoughts on the right balance between security and learning.
| fs.writeFileSync(path, message + '\n'); | ||
| } | ||
| //getmsg | ||
| var getrpMsg = function (pruno) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There should be some way to get events via an EventEmitter asynchronously.
src/pru.js
Outdated
| } | ||
| pruEnable(pruno, false); //disable PRU before loading firmware if not already disabled | ||
| var path = fw_path + pruno + ' -fw'; | ||
| shell.cp(filepath, path); //used because fs.copyFile() not supported, fast enough |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no it doesn't work as non-root user , will try to fix it
|
There will clearly be code coverage problems. Will the remote execution allow for tests on real hardware if I setup a tester farm? Will coveralls still suffer from the fact that the host is just issuing remote calls? Is there a way to import code coverage data from an automatically triggered job on remote boards. FYI for the test farm, I'm looking at setting up a number of Black Wireless boards to have some of the new BeagleBoard.org capes on them. If there are thoughts on using those capes for BoneScript testing, let me know. |
|
I am also aiming for remote-test support along with the remote execution implementation, i am not very sure about being able to import the coverage data, will look more into the details. |
vaishnavachath
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e338a64 to
57722e1
Compare
vaishnavachath
force-pushed
the
master
branch
14 times, most recently
from
f149b56 to
5f27270
Compare
compilation support for pru.js implemented using bone101 Makefile
added eventemitter based approach to receive rpmsg asynchronously
3 participants
Draft PRU Firmware loading support