paper-specs:0.1.0

[towoe]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description: Collection of screen sizes for tablets. Useful when creating documents for non standard sized devices.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
• added a typst.toml file with all required keys
• added a README.md with documentation for my package
• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
• tested my package locally on my system and it worked
• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

• ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

[saecki]

Thanks for this package! I've left a comment regarding the name.

[saecki]

This name is a little generic and could be misinterpreted as a list of paper specifications (A4 etc.). We try to avoid too canonical, so multiple packages serving the same purpose can coexist. See our naming rules.

[towoe]

Thanks for the feedback. Would you think something like 'epaper-spec' would still be too generic?
I will think about some other alternatives as well.

[towoe]

Would appreciate feedback on the suitability of a few name suggestions:

• "epaper-specs"
• "tablet-specs"
• "digital-sheets"
• "slate-sizes"
  First one which is okay I will pick :)
  Thanks!

[saecki]

I would say the "epaper-specs" and "tablet-specs" are too descriptive. With "digital-sheets" I'm also not quite comfortable, it's not that descriptive for this package, but I would assume it's a package for creating exercise sheets. "slate-sizes" would be more of the sort of name we want to see, you can pick this one :)