Skip to content

Add section on running both merge queues simultaneously#449

Open
pv72895 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/slack-add-github-merge-queue-migration-guide-b8Mli
Open

Add section on running both merge queues simultaneously#449
pv72895 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/slack-add-github-merge-queue-migration-guide-b8Mli

Conversation

@pv72895
Copy link
Contributor

@pv72895 pv72895 commented Mar 6, 2026

Document how Trunk Merge Queue can run alongside GitHub Merge Queue during a gradual migration. Covers:

  • No disruption to existing workflows
  • Disabling comments during evaluation
  • How Trunk handles external merges gracefully

Slack thread: https://trunk-io.slack.com/archives/C06973UPDU7/p1772817954315439

https://claude.ai/code/session_01XiND81kmk2wy4dMLxEYnJp

Document how Trunk Merge Queue can run alongside GitHub Merge Queue
during a gradual migration. Covers:
- No disruption to existing workflows
- Disabling comments during evaluation
- How Trunk handles external merges gracefully

Slack thread: https://trunk-io.slack.com/archives/C06973UPDU7/p1772817954315439

https://claude.ai/code/session_01XiND81kmk2wy4dMLxEYnJp
@pv72895 pv72895 requested review from agraebe and mmatheson March 6, 2026 17:34
@trunk-staging-io
Copy link

trunk-staging-io bot commented Mar 6, 2026

❌ This pull request failed tests. It has been removed from the merge queue. PR #452 was used for testing. See more details here.

Failed Required Status Conclusion
Trunk Code Quality Runner Failure
  • To merge this pull request, check the box to the left or comment /trunk merge below.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Claude finished @pv72895's task in 1m 12s —— View job


Review complete

  • Read changed file and diff
  • Check for typos, grammar, and formatting issues
  • Check documentation best practices
  • Post review feedback

The new "Running Both Merge Queues Simultaneously" section is well-structured and clearly explains the concurrent migration approach. I left two inline comments with suggestions:

  1. Heading case (line 27): The new heading uses Title Case while existing ### headings in the file use sentence case. Suggest changing to ### Running both merge queues simultaneously for consistency.

  2. Duplicate content (line 35): The "Disable Comments During Evaluation" subsection duplicates the same setting and navigation path already described in the "Pre migration" section below. Worth consolidating to avoid confusion.

No blocking issues — the content is accurate and adds useful value.


Enabling Trunk Merge Queue does not stop or prevent your current merging flow. GitHub's merge queue will continue to function normally and merge PRs as it always has. Your team can continue using their familiar workflow while you evaluate Trunk Merge Queue.

#### Disable Comments During Evaluation
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This subsection duplicates the content and navigation path already covered in the "Pre migration > Enable Trunk Merge for testing but with the automatic comments disabled" section below. Consider either removing this subsection and cross-referencing the pre-migration section, or consolidating it there to avoid confusion.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

/trunk merge

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approved: Claude code review passed.

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Claude finished @pv72895's task in 55s —— View job


Review complete

  • Read changed file and diff
  • Check for typos, grammar, and formatting issues
  • Check documentation best practices
  • Post review feedback

The ### heading case issue from my previous review has been fixed. Good. The content is accurate and well-structured.

Two remaining issues:

1. #### subheading case inconsistency (lines 31, 35, 41)

The new section's #### subheadings use Title Case:

  • #### No Disruption to Existing Workflows
  • #### Disable Comments During Evaluation
  • #### Trunk Handles External Merges Gracefully

But the existing #### subheadings in the file use sentence case:

  • #### Enable Trunk Merge for testing but with the automatic comments disabled
  • #### Make the switch
  • #### Share the news

Fix this →

2. Duplicate content (line 35–39 vs line 58–62)

The "Disable Comments During Evaluation" subsection duplicates the same setting and navigation path already in "Pre migration > Enable Trunk Merge for testing but with the automatic comments disabled". Both sections describe the same toggle in the same location. Worth consolidating to avoid confusion — either remove it here and cross-reference the pre-migration section, or keep it here and streamline the pre-migration section.

No blocking issues — the content is accurate and adds useful value.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

/trunk merge

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approved: Claude code review passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants