Skip to content

Conversation

@dev-jodee
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

  • Regenerate TEST_COVERAGE.md with a semantic, risk-weighted coverage methodology (Solana SBF programs cannot use LLVM coverage instrumentation)
  • Report covers all 314 tests (136 unit + 178 integration) mapped against the program's full testable surface
  • Overall estimated coverage: ~80% with per-category breakdowns (instruction handlers, account validation, business logic, error codes, state/traits, events/utilities, security edge cases)

Key Findings

  • All 11 instructions have happy-path integration tests (100%)
  • 14 of 15 custom error codes exercised (93%) — only InvalidEscrowId (0) untested
  • All security edge cases covered: re-initialization, double withdraw, cross-escrow receipt replay
  • Main gaps: verify_readonly paths, post-hook failure branches, and EmitEvent processor (only tested indirectly via CPI)

Regenerate TEST_COVERAGE.md with semantic coverage methodology since
Solana SBF programs cannot use LLVM instrumentation. Report now includes
risk-weighted coverage estimate (~80%), per-category breakdowns, specific
gap analysis, and full inventory of all 314 tests (136 unit + 178 integration).
@dev-jodee dev-jodee requested a review from amilz February 12, 2026 19:01
@dev-jodee dev-jodee merged commit 75e1239 into main Feb 12, 2026
5 checks passed
@dev-jodee dev-jodee deleted the chore/update-test-coverage-report branch February 12, 2026 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants