[ciqlts9_6] Multiple patches tested (6 commits)#899
Open
ciq-kernel-automation[bot] wants to merge 6 commits intociqlts9_6from
Open
[ciqlts9_6] Multiple patches tested (6 commits)#899ciq-kernel-automation[bot] wants to merge 6 commits intociqlts9_6from
ciq-kernel-automation[bot] wants to merge 6 commits intociqlts9_6from
Conversation
jira VULN-162877 cve CVE-2025-38349 commit-author Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> commit 8c2e52e Jann Horn points out that epoll is decrementing the ep refcount and then doing a mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx); afterwards. That's very wrong, because it can lead to a use-after-free. That pattern is actually fine for the very last reference, because the code in question will delay the actual call to "ep_free(ep)" until after it has unlocked the mutex. But it's wrong for the much subtler "next to last" case when somebody *else* may also be dropping their reference and free the ep while we're still using the mutex. Note that this is true even if that other user is also using the same ep mutex: mutexes, unlike spinlocks, can not be used for object ownership, even if they guarantee mutual exclusion. A mutex "unlock" operation is not atomic, and as one user is still accessing the mutex as part of unlocking it, another user can come in and get the now released mutex and free the data structure while the first user is still cleaning up. See our mutex documentation in Documentation/locking/mutex-design.rst, in particular the section [1] about semantics: "mutex_unlock() may access the mutex structure even after it has internally released the lock already - so it's not safe for another context to acquire the mutex and assume that the mutex_unlock() context is not using the structure anymore" So if we drop our ep ref before the mutex unlock, but we weren't the last one, we may then unlock the mutex, another user comes in, drops _their_ reference and releases the 'ep' as it now has no users - all while the mutex_unlock() is still accessing it. Fix this by simply moving the ep refcount dropping to outside the mutex: the refcount itself is atomic, and doesn't need mutex protection (that's the whole _point_ of refcounts: unlike mutexes, they are inherently about object lifetimes). Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Link: https://docs.kernel.org/locking/mutex-design.html#semantics [1] Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> (cherry picked from commit 8c2e52e) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>
jira VULN-163655 cve CVE-2025-39760 commit-author Xinyu Liu <katieeliu@tencent.com> commit cf16f40 usb_parse_ss_endpoint_companion() checks descriptor type before length, enabling a potentially odd read outside of the buffer size. Fix this up by checking the size first before looking at any of the fields in the descriptor. Signed-off-by: Xinyu Liu <katieeliu@tencent.com> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit cf16f40) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>
jira VULN-161129 cve CVE-2025-40269 commit-author Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> commit 05a1fc5 The PCM stream data in USB-audio driver is transferred over USB URB packet buffers, and each packet size is determined dynamically. The packet sizes are limited by some factors such as wMaxPacketSize USB descriptor. OTOH, in the current code, the actually used packet sizes are determined only by the rate and the PPS, which may be bigger than the size limit above. This results in a buffer overflow, as reported by syzbot. Basically when the limit is smaller than the calculated packet size, it implies that something is wrong, most likely a weird USB descriptor. So the best option would be just to return an error at the parameter setup time before doing any further operations. This patch introduces such a sanity check, and returns -EINVAL when the packet size is greater than maxpacksize. The comparison with ep->packsize[1] alone should suffice since it's always equal or greater than ep->packsize[0]. Reported-by: syzbot+bfd77469c8966de076f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=bfd77469c8966de076f7 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/690b6b46.050a0220.3d0d33.0054.GAE@google.com Cc: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251109091211.12739-1-tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> (cherry picked from commit 05a1fc5) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>
jira VULN-169407 cve CVE-2025-40271 commit-author Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com> commit 895b4c0 Pde is erased from subdir rbtree through rb_erase(), but not set the node to EMPTY, which may result in uaf access. We should use RB_CLEAR_NODE() set the erased node to EMPTY, then pde_subdir_next() will return NULL to avoid uaf access. We found an uaf issue while using stress-ng testing, need to run testcase getdent and tun in the same time. The steps of the issue is as follows: 1) use getdent to traverse dir /proc/pid/net/dev_snmp6/, and current pde is tun3; 2) in the [time windows] unregister netdevice tun3 and tun2, and erase them from rbtree. erase tun3 first, and then erase tun2. the pde(tun2) will be released to slab; 3) continue to getdent process, then pde_subdir_next() will return pde(tun2) which is released, it will case uaf access. CPU 0 | CPU 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- traverse dir /proc/pid/net/dev_snmp6/ | unregister_netdevice(tun->dev) //tun3 tun2 sys_getdents64() | iterate_dir() | proc_readdir() | proc_readdir_de() | snmp6_unregister_dev() pde_get(de); | proc_remove() read_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock); | remove_proc_subtree() | write_lock(&proc_subdir_lock); [time window] | rb_erase(&root->subdir_node, &parent->subdir); | write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock); read_lock(&proc_subdir_lock); | next = pde_subdir_next(de); | pde_put(de); | de = next; //UAF | rbtree of dev_snmp6 | pde(tun3) / \ NULL pde(tun2) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251025024233.158363-1-albin_yang@163.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (cherry picked from commit 895b4c0) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>
jira VULN-161235 cve CVE-2025-40304 commit-author Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com> commit 3637d34 Add bounds checking to prevent writes past framebuffer boundaries when rendering text near screen edges. Return early if the Y position is off-screen and clip image height to screen boundary. Break from the rendering loop if the X position is off-screen. When clipping image width to fit the screen, update the character count to match the clipped width to prevent buffer size mismatches. Without the character count update, bit_putcs_aligned and bit_putcs_unaligned receive mismatched parameters where the buffer is allocated for the clipped width but cnt reflects the original larger count, causing out-of-bounds writes. Reported-by: syzbot+48b0652a95834717f190@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=48b0652a95834717f190 Suggested-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Tested-by: syzbot+48b0652a95834717f190@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> (cherry picked from commit 3637d34) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>
|
🤖 Validation Checks In Progress Workflow run: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/22164577301 |
🔍 Interdiff Analysis
################################################################################
! REJECTED PATCH2 HUNKS - could not be compared; manual review needed !
################################################################################
--- b/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -844,7 +845,6 @@
{
struct rb_node *rbp, *next;
struct epitem *epi;
- bool dispose;
/* We need to release all tasks waiting for these file */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))This is an automated interdiff check for backported commits. |
|
✅ Validation checks completed successfully View full results: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/22164577301 |
ciq-kernel-automation
bot
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR has been automatically created after successful completion of all CI stages.
Commit Message(s)
Test Results
✅ Build Stage
✅ Boot Verification
✅ Kernel Selftests
Test Comparison
x86_64:
aarch64:
🤖 This PR was automatically generated by GitHub Actions
Run ID: 22161444043