TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

jakirkham · 2016-09-13T01:03:09Z

Please unsubscribe from this PR - it is a testing branch and will be noisy.

This adds a second good recipe called ok_recipe as a PR to the good_recipe branch. It does not have the good_recipe in its history though. Thus it should be useful for testing cases where recipes in only the base branch should be excluded or not.

pelson · 2016-09-13T02:01:47Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2016-11-26T04:05:52Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2017-09-21T15:26:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The recipe must have some tests.

pelson · 2017-09-22T03:38:42Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2018-08-10T14:53:06Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T15:05:43Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T16:47:45Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

pelson · 2018-08-10T17:13:58Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2019-07-22T19:09:08Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

license_file entry is missing, but is expected.

pelson · 2019-09-04T20:01:53Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-03-01T13:19:47Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-03-19T12:14:18Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint . from the recipe directory.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:14:59Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or Other) nor an SPDX license expression.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:24:09Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-08-11T22:07:45Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in (recipes/example/meta.yaml)

pelson · 2020-08-14T17:07:27Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in recipes/example/meta.yaml.

pelson · 2020-08-18T20:25:34Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I was trying to look for recipes to lint for you, but it appears we have a merge conflict.
Please try to merge or rebase with the base branch to resolve this conflict.

Please ping the 'conda-forge/core' team (using the @ notation in a comment) if you believe this is a bug.

pelson · 2020-08-18T21:10:21Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-08-18T22:09:31Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-linter · 2020-11-02T17:55:10Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2021-08-24T05:08:12Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2023-01-06T12:21:09Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-16T14:29:22Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-16T14:55:14Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-17T06:17:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

github-actions · 2024-09-20T10:39:15Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

The recipe must have some tests.

GHA4lyfe

github-actions · 2024-09-20T10:51:01Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

jakirkham changed the title ~~TESTING BRANCH: Added an ok recipe (without good recipe)~~ TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe Sep 13, 2016

jakirkham mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2017

Run new conda_forge lints #98

Merged

beckermr changed the base branch from good_branch to good_branch_beside August 18, 2020 20:44

conda-forge-curator bot added 30 commits December 30, 2025 06:04

[ci skip] empty commit

35404ae

[ci skip] empty commit

e6a92e5

[ci skip] empty commit

79c7f84

[ci skip] empty commit

ac7f278

[ci skip] empty commit

3448216

[ci skip] empty commit

351e3bc

[ci skip] empty commit

1cfbc52

[ci skip] empty commit

94b6792

[ci skip] empty commit

c4a30b6

[ci skip] empty commit

f344337

[ci skip] empty commit

f377453

[ci skip] empty commit

4a80e83

[ci skip] empty commit

108b695

[ci skip] empty commit

6eeff7b

[ci skip] empty commit

a2d7bb2

[ci skip] empty commit

efe3946

[ci skip] empty commit

890eb57

[ci skip] empty commit

18c9946

[ci skip] empty commit

78c19ac

[ci skip] empty commit

7149aa4

[ci skip] empty commit

51f7720

[ci skip] empty commit

9e9330c

[ci skip] empty commit

c649473

[ci skip] empty commit

5b6a7e9

[ci skip] empty commit

0a8e169

[ci skip] empty commit

af950af

[ci skip] empty commit

562b17e

[ci skip] empty commit

ccf8fce

[ci skip] empty commit

c90e7fd

[ci skip] empty commit

8cbb1d2

Uh oh!

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

Are you sure you want to change the base?

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

Uh oh!

Conversation

jakirkham commented Sep 13, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 13, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Nov 26, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 21, 2017

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 22, 2017

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

pelson commented Jul 22, 2019

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 4, 2019

Uh oh!

beckermr commented Mar 1, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 11, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 14, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

beckermr commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

conda-forge-linter commented Nov 2, 2020

Uh oh!

conda-forge-curator bot commented Aug 24, 2021

Uh oh!

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Uh oh!

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Uh oh!

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Uh oh!

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading