TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe above good recipe #54

jakirkham · 2016-09-02T00:58:39Z

Please unsubscribe from this PR - it is a testing branch and will be noisy.

This adds a second good recipe called ok_recipe as a PR to the good_recipe branch. Thus it should be useful for testing cases where recipes in the base branch should be excluded or not.

pelson · 2016-09-02T01:04:23Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2016-11-26T04:05:49Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2017-09-21T15:26:46Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The recipe must have some tests.

pelson · 2017-09-22T03:38:39Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2018-08-10T14:52:59Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T15:05:30Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T16:47:31Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

pelson · 2018-08-10T17:13:53Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2019-07-22T19:09:01Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

license_file entry is missing, but is expected.

pelson · 2019-09-04T20:01:46Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-03-01T13:19:38Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-03-19T12:14:11Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint . from the recipe directory.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:14:54Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or Other) nor an SPDX license expression.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:24:02Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-08-11T22:07:38Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in (recipes/example/meta.yaml)

pelson · 2020-08-14T17:07:21Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in recipes/example/meta.yaml.

pelson · 2020-08-18T20:25:29Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I was trying to look for recipes to lint for you, but it appears we have a merge conflict.
Please try to merge or rebase with the base branch to resolve this conflict.

Please ping the 'conda-forge/core' team (using the @ notation in a comment) if you believe this is a bug.

pelson · 2020-08-18T21:10:16Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-08-18T22:09:23Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-linter · 2020-11-02T17:55:05Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

This was referenced Sep 2, 2016

Purges recipes in base of PRs before linting #53

Merged

TESTING BRANCH: Test a closed PR #52

Closed

jakirkham mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2016

Lint PR merge commit #61

Merged

jakirkham force-pushed the ok_branch branch 2 times, most recently from 496b0d7 to 445d057 Compare September 13, 2016 00:56

jakirkham changed the title ~~TESTING BRANCH: Added an ok recipe.~~ TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe above good recipe Sep 13, 2016

djsutherland mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2018

close re-render/etc issues if nothing is needed #227

Merged

djsutherland mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2018

get_section: check ABCs instead of list/dict subclass conda-forge/conda-smithy#871

Merged

djsutherland mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2018

don't complain about bioconda for packages with no name conda-forge/conda-smithy#872

Merged

beckermr changed the base branch from good_branch to good_branch_beside August 18, 2020 20:47

conda-forge-curator bot added 30 commits December 30, 2025 06:06

[ci skip] empty commit

d942b71

[ci skip] empty commit

add8a49

[ci skip] empty commit

73e9dc5

[ci skip] empty commit

a2b305e

[ci skip] empty commit

0db08fb

[ci skip] empty commit

2a91073

[ci skip] empty commit

4022c67

[ci skip] empty commit

8e10d49

[ci skip] empty commit

924aeaa

[ci skip] empty commit

718bee5

[ci skip] empty commit

44ea9e6

[ci skip] empty commit

2d3363a

[ci skip] empty commit

4eb0470

[ci skip] empty commit

f5a2e4e

[ci skip] empty commit

faf9e5b

[ci skip] empty commit

acb8b3e

[ci skip] empty commit

a8a6199

[ci skip] empty commit

e86007a

[ci skip] empty commit

da4fa9e

[ci skip] empty commit

964fe68

[ci skip] empty commit

b81bdc8

[ci skip] empty commit

0aa3593

[ci skip] empty commit

a3a0d9b

[ci skip] empty commit

488e146

[ci skip] empty commit

9bd43a4

[ci skip] empty commit

82ec03f

[ci skip] empty commit

e279938

[ci skip] empty commit

ac98ba1

[ci skip] empty commit

5fffa37

[ci skip] empty commit

d6ce8ae

Uh oh!

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe above good recipe #54

Are you sure you want to change the base?

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe above good recipe #54

Conversation

jakirkham commented Sep 2, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 2, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Nov 26, 2016

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 21, 2017

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 22, 2017

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

Uh oh!

pelson commented Jul 22, 2019

Uh oh!

pelson commented Sep 4, 2019

Uh oh!

beckermr commented Mar 1, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 11, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 14, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

beckermr commented Aug 18, 2020

Uh oh!

conda-forge-linter commented Nov 2, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants