Skip to content

Comments

Add missing snippet to Holder documentation#805

Merged
yrezgui merged 1 commit intomainfrom
identity-update-snippet
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

Add missing snippet to Holder documentation#805
yrezgui merged 1 commit intomainfrom
identity-update-snippet

Conversation

@cy245
Copy link
Contributor

@cy245 cy245 commented Feb 20, 2026

No description provided.

@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 1 region tag.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @cy245, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the documentation generation process by inserting specific [START] and [END] markers within the handleSelectedCredential function in DigitalCredentialHolder.kt. This ensures that the relevant code block can be accurately extracted and included in external documentation, improving clarity for developers integrating with the Digital Credential Holder.

Highlights

  • Documentation Markers: Added // [START android_identity_process_selected_credential] and // [END android_identity_process_selected_credential] comments to delineate a code snippet within the handleSelectedCredential function. These markers are crucial for automated documentation generation, ensuring that this specific code block can be easily extracted and presented in external documentation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds documentation snippet markers to the handleSelectedCredential function in DigitalCredentialHolderActivity. While the markers are correctly placed, the code being wrapped for the documentation snippet contains a reference to an undefined variable, which will cause a compilation error. My review includes a critical comment to address this issue to ensure the documented code sample is valid and functional.

@yrezgui yrezgui enabled auto-merge (squash) February 20, 2026 20:19
@yrezgui yrezgui merged commit fbed24d into main Feb 20, 2026
6 checks passed
@yrezgui yrezgui deleted the identity-update-snippet branch February 20, 2026 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants