ENH: Implement Parachute Opening Shock Force Estimation

[FelipeAlmeidaUSP]

Hey team!

I am submitting this PR as part of my participation on the recruitment process for the RocketPy Library Development Team.

I decided on taking on the following issue: #161

Here, I updated the parachute class to include the "calculate_opening_shock" function to estimate the opening shock force during the rocket's parachute opening. I followed the discussion topics on the github issue and consulted the reference textbook in order to implement my proposed feature.

I created a new test file under the unit test folder to evaluate if my formula was correctly estimating the force related to the parachute opening process, where I implemented the following example from the textbook and compared if the results presented in the code and in the book matched. The test was successful.

I also integrated the calculation function into the flight simulations to account for the conditions during the exact moment the parachute is triggered. However, while I was adding a new test to the flight simulations, under the integration folder, to confirm if the integration was being done correctly I was unable to get the test to function properly and the errors resulted in the test's fail.

I spent a few hours debugging but was unable to find the problem, but I included in these files a few # TODO comments highlighting the next steps to complete the proposed feature, including both roadmap changes to improve on the analysis and the fix related to the integration test. I am open to suggestions and corrections in my additions, please feel free to reach out to me!

Thanks for the opportunity to learn new things while helping the tool expand!

[FelipeAlmeidaUSP]

Hey team!

I kept working on the code and found out that the overshoot loop inside the simulation was ignoring the changes I had made. By implementing the same shock force estimation feature inside the overshoot loop (and to prevent clutter I changed the approach to use a new function instead of copying the same lines as before) the tests begun working as expected.

I ran black across all my files but don't know why linters has failed, still learning this github thing haha!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.04%. Comparing base (9cf3dd4) to head (0f8f3a6).
⚠️ Report is 24 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
rocketpy/simulation/flight.py	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #910      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    80.27%   81.04%   +0.77%     
===========================================
  Files          104      107       +3     
  Lines        12769    13659     +890     
===========================================
+ Hits         10250    11070     +820     
- Misses        2519     2589      +70     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Gui-FernandesBR]

@FelipeAlmeidaUSP please fix git conflicts before our review.

git checkout develop
git pull -p
git checkout your_branch
git rebase -i develop
(solve the conflicts)
git push -f

Also, please fix linters