Merged
Conversation
yatharthranjan
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
mpgxvii
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
Member
mpgxvii
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @pvannierop, LGTM. Sorry I missed your Slack message but yes we did run into a similar issue with Oura because the data is pulled at daily intervals as well, and we were only adding a very small offset after every successful request. It was updated here: #147. (and later refined to use a 12-hour overlap but one day works for this Fitbit RHR case)
4044640 to
2432bb3
Compare
2432bb3 to
342519d
Compare
342519d to
caf358f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
The Snyk test fail, but I plan to update these in a followup PR part of the March 2026 security updates. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
On the CONNECT project we experienced problems with retrieval of Fitbit resting heart rate (RHR) data. The Fitbit connector would every day download the same RHR datum that lies far in the past.
Analysis
As far as I can see there is a problem with determining the date of the next RHR datum. RHR is queried at the resolution of a single day:
The existing logic will take the date of the last successful RHR datum, add one second, round this to days and use the resulting day to query the next RHR datum:
This will effectively result in the same day being queried over and over since this will always resolve to the same day offset of the last successfull datum.
Solution
This PR will correct the offset for the next datum by progressing the
startDatewith one day instead of one second.