This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
RFC: Remove next callbacks#83
Draft
rekmarks wants to merge 4 commits intoasync-next-return-handlersfrom
Draft
Conversation
rekmarks
commented
Jun 24, 2021
|
In reviewing #81 and the current way that middleware is processed I came to this conclusion, so even if there is another reason to do this, this makes sense just based on how this library does things anyway :) |
Contributor
|
This library has now been migrated into the core monorepo. This PR has been locked and this repo will be archived shortly. Going forward, releases of this library will only include changes made in the core repo.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requires: #82
We don't need the next callbacks. This PR removes them. Return handlers are supported by directly returning them from the middleware instead.