Expand TypeChecker to raise SDCLimitation('...Unsupported...')#771
Expand TypeChecker to raise SDCLimitation('...Unsupported...')#771densmirn wants to merge 4 commits intoIntelPython:masterfrom
Conversation
sdc/utilities/sdc_typing_utils.py
Outdated
| self._raise_exc(self, exc_cls, self.default_tmpl, self.func_name, | ||
| name, data, expected_types) | ||
|
|
||
| def raise_unsupported_exc(self, data, name='', exc_cls=TypingError): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe use default exception as SDCLimitation, as it seems to be more appropriate in this case?
| self._raise_exc(exc_cls, self.default_tmpl, self.func_name, | ||
| name, data, expected_types) | ||
|
|
||
| def raise_unsupported_exc(self, data, name='', exc_cls=SDCLimitation): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking of replacing all raises related to SDC limitations with this, but it seems this only covers case of unsupported parameters, so for instance in series.fillna we have:
raise TypingError('{} Not implemented when Series dtype is {} and\
inplace={}'.format(_func_name, self.dtype, inplace))
Maybe add in raise_exc and internal func additional parameter e.g. msg, which if exists will be used instead of default msg format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you mean to replace call
msg = '{} Not implemented when Series dtype is {} and inplace={}'.format(_func_name, self.dtype, inplace)
raise SDCLimitation(msg)with something like this
msg = '{} Not implemented when Series dtype is {} and inplace={}'.format(_func_name, self.dtype, inplace)
ty_checker.raise_exc(None, None, exc_cls=SDCLimitation, msg=msg)?
I think TypeChecker shouldn't be used for such complicated cases, TypeChecker doesn't make sense, when it increases the amount of code and makes it harder.
Maybe I didn't catch you correctly, please correct me in this case.
2 participants
No description provided.