Skip to content

London | 26-ITP-Jan | Boualem Larbi Djebbour | Sprint 1 | wireframe#1158

Open
djebsoft wants to merge 24 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
djebsoft:feature/wireframe
Open

London | 26-ITP-Jan | Boualem Larbi Djebbour | Sprint 1 | wireframe#1158
djebsoft wants to merge 24 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
djebsoft:feature/wireframe

Conversation

@djebsoft
Copy link

@djebsoft djebsoft commented Feb 7, 2026

Learners, PR Template

Self checklist

  • I have titled my PR with Region | Cohort | FirstName LastName | Sprint | Assignment Title
  • My changes meet the requirements of the task
  • I have tested my changes
  • My changes follow the style guide

Changelist

making some changes to create webpage.

Questions

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Deploy Preview for cyf-onboarding-module ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 316fe0e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cyf-onboarding-module/deploys/6991360bc0e4f90008d6480e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1158--cyf-onboarding-module.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
2 paths audited
Performance: 100 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 86 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@djebsoft djebsoft changed the title Feature/wireframe London | 26-ITP-Jan | Boualem Larbi Djebbour | Sprint 1 | wireframe Feb 7, 2026
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Removed starter styles and design palette comments. Updated styles for body, header, main, articles, article, and footer.
@djebsoft djebsoft added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 7, 2026
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 7, 2026
@djebsoft djebsoft added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 7, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@cjyuan cjyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you take a look at this General Feedback to see if there
is anything you can do to make your PR more robust and ready?
Doing so can help speed up the review process.

@cjyuan cjyuan added Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take. and removed Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. labels Feb 8, 2026
@djebsoft
Copy link
Author

thank you for reviewing.
good points, I tried to fix them as follows:
I made sure my PR is well prepared
I added and edited a profile readme and willing to add more details about me later.
I completed my index.html filechecking, fixed errors (specially the

tag) then ended up with errors or warnings to show.
I completed my style.css file checking with no errors found.
I properly enhanced my code indentation using VSCode buily-in format document function.

@djebsoft djebsoft added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 11, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@cjyuan cjyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is free of syntax error. Well done.

To better match the wireframe, can you

  • Layout articles 2 and 3 side by side beneath article 1
  • Make the image in each article span the full width of the articles?
  • Introduce a border around the READ MORE link
  • Make the image in article 1 visible

width: 100%;
background-color: lightyellow;
text-align: center;
padding: 0.01rem;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you find out how much space is 0.01rem?

<main>
<article>
<img src="https://www.nicepng.com/png/full/357-3576824_this-free-icons-png-design-of-readme-document.png" alt=""
style="width: 150px" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better practice is to separate CSS from HTML and write the CSS code in an external file.

@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 11, 2026
@djebsoft
Copy link
Author

thank you for reviewing
I fixed the following:
layout 2 and 3 side by side under layout 1
read more border
image 1 sorted

@djebsoft djebsoft added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 15, 2026
@cjyuan
Copy link
Contributor

cjyuan commented Feb 15, 2026

  • When I opened the page deployed at Netlify, I could not see the images in article 1 and 2 (see pic).
image

For this exercise, you can just use placeholder.svg in all three articles.


  • Can you use an AI tool to inspect the page content, and then fix all the typos?

  • In the wireframe, there is spacing between the article content and the border. On your page, however, the text and links are touching the border. Can you leave more space around the article content?

@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Feb 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants