[wg/social] Considerations for the Working Group

[plehegar]

[[

• Consider merging popular features from large implementations into the main vocabulary (such as Mastodon extensions)

• Consider exploring decentralizing ActivityPub more by using things like cryptographic event logs: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/cel-spec/#the-activitypub-cel-specification (but, clearly, don't do the work if there is little interest/implementers)

]]
From AC Review

[plehegar]

I don't think the charter needs further tweaks for this comment. Those considerations are addressing directly the (future) Working Group participants imho.

[plehegar]

cc @dariusk

[plehegar]

I responded directly to the commenter by email.